Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 759 P.2d 558
  • 1988 Alas. App. LEXIS 72
  • 1988 WL 80224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, when an attorney has made a tactical choice, the defendant must show that the tactic itself was unreasonable — that is, that no reasonably competent attorney would have adopted the tactic under the circumstances
  • explaining that Alaska’s prejudice prong of the ineffective assistance of counsel standard is “significantly less demanding” than the federal standard
  • noting that for a defendant to rebut the presumption of their attorney’s competence, the defendant “must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action ‘might be considered sound trial strategy’” (emphasis added
  • requiring a petitioner's presence at an evidentiary hearing when \the disputed issues involve facts within the [petitioner's] personal knowledge\
  • requiring a petitioner’s presence at an evidentiary hearing when “the disputed issues involve facts within the [petitioner’s] personal knowledge”
  • discussing motions for judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment in cases filed under Criminal Rule 35.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.