Skip to main content
· 8/28/1992

Steffensen v. State

Citations

  • 837 P.2d 1123
  • 1992 Alas. App. LEXIS 64
  • 1992 WL 206793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that attorney acted incompetently by failing to file suppression motion over petitioner’s argument that “there was everything to gain and nothing to lose by filing” such motion, and holding that petitioner had not overcome presumption of competence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Mannheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.