Eleventh Circuit· 5/23/2008
Taylor v. Williams
Citations
- 528 F.3d 847
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11051
- 2008 WL 2150036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming pro se petitioner delivered his § 2254 habeas petition to prison authorities for mailing on the day he signed it
- assuming pro se petitioner delivered his § 2254 habeas petition to prison authorities on the day he signed it
- assuming pro se petitioner delivered his § 2254 habeas petition to prison authorities on the day he signed it
- “Under the federal ‘mailbox rule,’ a pro se federal habeas petition is deemed to be filed on the date it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing.”
- “Under the federal ‘mailbox rule,’ a pro se federal habeas petition is deemed to be filed on the date it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing.”
- “Under the federal ‘mailbox rule,’ a pro se federal habeas petition is deemed to be filed on the date it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Anderson, Cox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaEleventh Circuit· 1981-11-03· cited 11,375×
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court· 2000-11-07· cited 1,366×
- Murray v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1998-07-07· cited 381×
- Carl D. Bond v. Michael W. MooreEleventh Circuit· 2002-10-10· cited 205×
- Diaz v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2004-03-10· cited 106×
- Quincy Wade v. Ralph BattleEleventh Circuit· 2004-08-06· cited 92×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-07-05· cited 40×
- Massaline v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-22· cited 33×
- Arceneaux v. Texaco, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1980-07-25· cited 30×
- Daniel Siebert v. Donal CampbellEleventh Circuit· 2003-06-23· cited 28×
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-01-30· cited 21×
- Alejandro Escareno v. Noltina Crucible and Refractory Corporation, Carl Nolte Sohne GmbhEleventh Circuit· 1998-05-01· cited 20×
- McCroskey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-02-28· cited 10×
- Rolland v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-10-30· cited 9×
- State v. JaramilloSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-10-03· cited 8×
- Mingledorff v. StokelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-10-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.