Skip to main content
· 10/10/2002

Carl D. Bond v. Michael W. Moore

Citations

  • 309 F.3d 770
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21227
  • 2002 WL 31261026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statute of limitations in § 2244(d) begins to run when the 90-day window in Rule 13.1 expires
  • holding that the statute of limitations in § 2244(d) begins to run when the 90-day window in Rule 13.1 expires
  • holding that AEDPA's limitations period does not begin to run until the 90-day window during which petitioner could have petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari expires
  • holding that the one-year period of limitation does not begin to run until the ninety-day period for filing a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States has expired
  • holding that the one-year period of limitation does not begin to run until the ninety-day period for filing a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States has expired
  • holding that the one-year period of limitation does not begin to run until the ninety-day period for filing a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States has expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Black, Propst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.