· 10/10/2002
Carl D. Bond v. Michael W. Moore
Citations
- 309 F.3d 770
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21227
- 2002 WL 31261026
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the statute of limitations in § 2244(d) begins to run when the 90-day window in Rule 13.1 expires
- holding that the statute of limitations in § 2244(d) begins to run when the 90-day window in Rule 13.1 expires
- holding that AEDPA's limitations period does not begin to run until the 90-day window during which petitioner could have petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari expires
- holding that the one-year period of limitation does not begin to run until the ninety-day period for filing a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States has expired
- holding that the one-year period of limitation does not begin to run until the ninety-day period for filing a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States has expired
- holding that the one-year period of limitation does not begin to run until the ninety-day period for filing a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States has expired
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birch, Black, Propst
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.