D. Maryland· 8/18/1978
Taylor v. Swirnow
Citations
- 80 F.R.D. 79
- 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15945
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the parties lacked antagonism when plaintiffs owned a majority share in the corporation, among other reasons
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative LitigationNinth Circuit· 2008-12-11· cited 268×
- Heniford v. American Motors Sales Corp.D. South Carolina· 1979-05-25· cited 56×
- George B. Liddy v. Lawrence W. UrbanekEleventh Circuit· 1983-06-20· cited 47×
- Reilly Mortgage Group, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Savings & Loan Ass'nE.D. Virginia· 1983-08-02· cited 22×
- Duffey v. WheelerEleventh Circuit· 1987-07-02· cited 20×
- Battle v. Alpha Chemical and Paper Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2000-05-26· cited 15×
- In Re West Pointe Properties, L.P.E.D. Tennessee· 2000-05-22· cited 14×
- Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. UMET TrustE.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-04-25· cited 12×
- Diaz v. DavisNinth Circuit· 2008-12-11· cited 11×
- Gibson v. BoPar Dock Co. Corp.W.D. Virginia· 1991-11-14· cited 6×
- Fair v. Nationwide Mortgage Corp.District of Columbia· 1983-10-11· cited 6×
- Hildebrand v. LewisE.D. Virginia· 2003-09-10· cited 6×
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 1981-09-16· cited 5×
- Rothberg v. Quadrangle Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-07-28· cited 5×
- Berk v. ShermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-09-05· cited 3×
- Hebei Tiankai Wood & Land Constr. Co. v. ChenE.D. New York· 2018-12-21· cited 1×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 1,073×
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court· 1969-11-10· cited 1,046×
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court· 1957-06-10· cited 488×
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court· 1941-11-10· cited 471×
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court· 1941-12-08· cited 372×
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court· 1893-05-15· cited 234×
- Dallas Cabana, Inc. v. Hyatt Corporation and Donald N. PritzkerFifth Circuit· 1971-05-07· cited 67×
- Swanson v. TraerSupreme Court· 1957-06-10· cited 56×
- Schmidt v. Esquire, Inc. Schmidt v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, Inc. Schmidt v. Crowell-Collier Pub. CoSeventh Circuit· 1954-02-24· cited 50×
- Harry Lewis v. Robert S. Odell, and Howard Butcher IIISecond Circuit· 1974-09-24· cited 49×
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-12-06· cited 39×
- In Re WebbFourth Circuit· 1932-01-12· cited 28×
- Marguerite Irwin v. West End Development Company, a Colorado CorporationTenth Circuit· 1973-08-17· cited 22×
- United States v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1942-04-27· cited 19×
- United States of America and Mortimer Todel, as Receiver of the Funds, Assets and Property of Roosevelt Capital Corporation v. Franklin National BankSecond Circuit· 1975-02-24· cited 18×
- Coyle v. SkirvinTenth Circuit· 1942-01-08· cited 14×
- Kartub v. Optical Fashions, Inc.S.D. New York· 1958-02-11· cited 13×
- Tessari v. HeraldN.D. Indiana· 1962-08-16· cited 13×
- Irwin v. West End Development CompanyD. Colorado· 1972-06-23· cited 13×
- Chesapeake Financial Corp. v. GoldsteinFourth Circuit· 1978-05-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.