George B. Liddy v. Lawrence W. Urbanek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• absence of an indispensable party, whose presence would defeat diversity jurisdiction, may be raised for the first time on appeal
• corporation should have been permanently realigned as a plaintiff where no real antagonism existed
• where the “complaint in a derivative action alleges that the ... dominant officials of the corporation are guilty of fraud or malfeasance, then antagonism is clearly evident and the corporation remains a defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).