Taylor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that statement to the jury that the grand jury had heard the same evidence before the petit jury, and the grand jury had returned an indictment was harmful, but the trial court did not err because it cured the harm by a prompt instruction to disregard
• determining that statement to the jury that the grand jury had heard the same evidence before the petit jury, and the grand jury had returned an indictment was harmful, but the trial court did not err because it cured the harm by a prompt instruction to disregard
• “The evidence is sufficient to show that when the two young men were bound and gagged and left on the freezing floor inside the locker there was a substantial risk of serious bodily injury and they were intentionally restrained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• May v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-20· cited 152×
• Goocher v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-10· cited 87×
• Parr v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-09-27· cited 80×
• Plunkett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-16· cited 64×
• Little v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-06-14· cited 23×
• Hurley v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2017-08-23· cited 9×
• Eugene James Mingo, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-06-10
• Albert James Jenkins v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-01-19
• Ernesto Loredo, Jr. v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2025-05-30

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-23· cited 36×
• Hunnicutt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-21· cited 12×