Skip to main content
· 11/16/1960

Parr v. State

Citations

  • 170 Tex. Crim. 481
  • 341 S.W.2d 922
  • 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that lack of hesitation factor could be applied where there was proof that individuals other than the victim were present and placed in peril
  • holding that enhancement factor (3) may not be applied to enhance a sentence when the defendant is separately convicted of the offenses committed against each victim
  • applying factor (10) when other people present cou ld have been injured
  • attempt to commit first degree murder and second degree murder
  • attempted first degree murder and attempted second degree murder
  • listing the three situations where presumption would not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dice, Woodley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.