· 11/16/1960
Parr v. State
Citations
- 170 Tex. Crim. 481
- 341 S.W.2d 922
- 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that lack of hesitation factor could be applied where there was proof that individuals other than the victim were present and placed in peril
- holding that enhancement factor (3) may not be applied to enhance a sentence when the defendant is separately convicted of the offenses committed against each victim
- applying factor (10) when other people present cou ld have been injured
- attempt to commit first degree murder and second degree murder
- attempted first degree murder and attempted second degree murder
- listing the three situations where presumption would not apply
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dice, Woodley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.