Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 676 N.E.2d 1044
  • 1997 WL 81146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[t]he tendered instruction, commonly referred to as a missing witness instruction, is not generally favored in Indiana”
  • missing witness instruction not appropriate when witness is available to both parties
  • “[t]he tendered instruction, commonly referred to as a missing witness instruction, is not generally favored in Indiana”
  • “[T]he trial court was well within its discretion in ruling that Taylor was entitled to no more than a continuance. The trial court effectively gave Taylor that relief by allowing him to interview and cross-examine the witness.”
  • finding no basis for reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.