Skip to main content
· 8/28/1985

Gossmeyer v. State

Citations

  • 482 N.E.2d 239
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • bolding that the State rebutted the entrapment defense because it demonstrated the accused's predisposition by showing the possession of a large quantities of drugs, the ability to access large quantities of drugs in a short time, the knowledge of sources, and the manner of conducting the sale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Prentice, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.