Taylor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a surprise attack with a crowbar, which was wielded with enough force to split open the victim’s head, was competent substantial evidence of the use of a deadly weapon
• holding that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that a crowbar was used as a deadly weapon where the victim had been hit on the top of his head, splitting his head open and causing him to bleed, lose consciousness, and require treatment at a hospital

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nardone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-07· cited 75×
• Morris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-17· cited 7×
• E.M.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-12· cited 2×
• A.L.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-05· cited 1×
• Buckley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-28
• Frazier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-01

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tibbs v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
• Tibbs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-09· cited 432×
• Bradshaw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-20· cited 44×
• Rose v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-09· cited 22×
• D.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-08· cited 22×
• E.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-19· cited 21×
• Grissom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-10-30· cited 10×
• Donaldson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-02-27· cited 2×