Morris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dogs are “deadly weapons” when trained and used as “instruments” to cause great bodily harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-29· cited 16×
• State v. Hoeldt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-06-12· cited 8×
• St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. TINGLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-13· cited 6×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• San Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-11· cited 109×
• Mungin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-09-07· cited 49×
• State v. Bowers
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1986-06-13· cited 33×
• Coronado v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-17· cited 26×
• Perkins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-09-04· cited 22×
• D.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-08· cited 22×
• People v. Nealis
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-04-11· cited 20×
• People v. Kay
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-11-17· cited 19×
• Michael v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-10-14· cited 9×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-16· cited 8×
• St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. TINGLEY SYSTEMS, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-13· cited 6×
• Dixon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-14· cited 5×