Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2/3/1998
Taylor v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 495 S.E.2d 522
- 26 Va. App. 485
- 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 55
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the government’s interest in using the appellant’s pre-arrest silence in response to a police officer’s question as substantive evidence of guilt is substantially outweighed by the burden which such practice imposes on the privilege against self-incrimination”
- stating that policies underlying privilege against self-incrimination support conclusion that Virginia’s constitution prohibits the state from using a defendant’s pre-arrest silence as part of its case in chief
- finding that the prosecution’s sole objective in using silence was to prove guilt
- assuming without discussion that interview of hospitalized driver regarding car accident was non-custodial
- based upon Virginia constitutional provision
- based upon Virginia constitutional provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Molina, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-11-20· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. Adams, S., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-11-20· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. MolinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-09· cited 57×
- Hartigan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-12-28· cited 23×
- State v. KulzerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-07-24· cited 15×
- Hazel v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-02-01· cited 6×
- Com. v. MolinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-08-13· cited 1×
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court· 1976-04-20· cited 2,133×
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 1,503×
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,359×
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court· 1892-01-11· cited 1,118×
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-05-27· cited 1,102×
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 969×
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 749×
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-04-28· cited 735×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 647×
- Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 420×
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 264×
- Immuno AG. v. Moor-JankowskiNew York Court of Appeals· 1991-01-15· cited 247×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.