Skip to main content

Taylor v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 495 S.E.2d 522
  • 26 Va. App. 485
  • 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 55

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the government’s interest in using the appellant’s pre-arrest silence in response to a police officer’s question as substantive evidence of guilt is substantially outweighed by the burden which such practice imposes on the privilege against self-incrimination”
  • stating that policies underlying privilege against self-incrimination support conclusion that Virginia’s constitution prohibits the state from using a defendant’s pre-arrest silence as part of its case in chief
  • finding that the prosecution’s sole objective in using silence was to prove guilt
  • assuming without discussion that interview of hospitalized driver regarding car accident was non-custodial
  • based upon Virginia constitutional provision
  • based upon Virginia constitutional provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.