Skip to main content

Taylor, Henry Earl

Citations

  • 424 S.W.3d 39
  • 2014 WL 440990
  • 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding appellate court had jurisdiction when the notice of appeal actually reached the correct destination within the period of time permitted by the mailbox rule
  • holding date of receipt in court of appeals and date subsequently filed in trial court are operative dates for determining timeliness of notice of appeal
  • holding that because the address to which appellant sent his notice of appeal was “sufficiently specific” for the document to be received in the proper place at the proper time, the notice of appeal was properly filed for purposes of the mailbox rule
  • stating that filing timely notice of appeal invokes court of appeals’ appellate jurisdiction
  • under “prisoner mailbox rule,” pro se inmate’s notice is deemed filed when document is received by prison authorities for mailing
  • under “prisoner mailbox rule,” pro se inmate’s notice is deemed filed when document is received by prison authorities for mailing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Meyers, Price, Johnson, Hervey, Cochran, Keller, Keasler, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Taylor, Henry Earl

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.