· 6/25/2004
Williams v. T.D.C.J.-I.D.
Citations
- 142 S.W.3d 308
- 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 742
- 2004 Tex. LEXIS 589
- 2004 WL 1434799
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that court would \presume\ that docketing statement was timely received \absent argument and evidence to the contrary\ because it was mailed ten days before filing deadline
- stating that court would “presume” that docketing statement was timely received “absent argument and evidence to the contrary” because it was mailed ten days before filing deadline
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.