Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 840 S.W.2d 439
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 199
  • 1992 WL 308937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that to be “properly addressed” an envelope or wrapper must be “sufficiently specific as to be timely received at the proper place”
  • interpreting former Rule 4(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which contained substantially the same language as current Rule 9.2(b)
  • interpreting former Rule 4(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which contained substantially the same language as current Rule 9.2(b)
  • applying former Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b), the predecessor to Rule 9.2(b)
  • applying mailbox rule to filing of cost bond in appeal of criminal case
  • applying an agency theory that “an employee who works in the receiving department in the Frank Crowley Courts Building, whose duties include processing and forwarding mail, can be properly considered an agent of the district clerk”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.