Taye v. Amundson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A negligence claim based solely on a breach of the duty to fulfill one’s obligations under a contract . . . is duplicative and unsustainable.”
• when not otherwise alleged, EEOC letters are presumptively received three to five days later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bailey v. Verizon Communications Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2008-04-14· cited 24×
• Golden v. Management & Training Corporation
  District of Columbia· 2017-07-21· cited 16×
• Faktor v. United States
  District of Columbia· 2021-03-04

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 1,661×
• George HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEPHENSON ROOFING, INC., Defendant-Appellee
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-05-07· cited 56×
• Anderson v. Local 201 Reinforcing Rodmen
  District of Columbia· 1995-05-18· cited 38×
• Andrew Maurice Redwood v. Council of the District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 1982-05-28· cited 27×