Anderson v. Local 201 Reinforcing Rodmen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[c]ourts are divided as to the presumptive date of a right-to-sue letter,” but that it is either three or five days after the letter’s issuance
• finding that courts are divided whether the rule should be three or five days of presumptive notice
• noting that a pro se plaintiff is “not . . . immune from the ninety-day requirement”
• noting that most courts apply a presumption of receipt of a right- to-sue letter three or five days after the decision was issued
• finding that the pro se plaintiff’s filing was untimely “[r]egardless of which presumptive receipt rule the Court adopts – the three-day or five-day rule”
• noting that courts apply a three-or five-day presumption from date of mailing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).