District of Columbia· 4/14/2008
Bailey v. Verizon Communications Inc.
Citations
- 544 F. Supp. 2d 33
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30099
- 2008 WL 1723940
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[i]f a plaintiff’s EEOC charge makes a class of allegation altogether different from that which she later alleges when seeking relief in federal district court, she will have failed to exhaust administrative remedies”
- dismissing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies race and gender discrimination claims where plaintiff checked only the box indicating that she was alleging age discrimination claim under the ADEA on her EEOC claim form
- “If a plaintiff's EEOC charge makes a class of allegation altogether different from that which she later alleges when seeking relief in federal district court, she will have failed to exhaust administrative 6 remedies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Royce C. Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Williams v. SpencerDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-13· cited 56×
- Hudson v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-21· cited 27×
- Ghawanmeh v. Islamic Saudi AcademyDistrict of Columbia· 2009-11-27· cited 26×
- Zelaya v. UNICCO SERVICE COMPANYDistrict of Columbia· 2008-11-26· cited 21×
- Montgomery v. Omnisec International Security Services, Inc.District of Columbia· 2013-08-20· cited 21×
- Dyson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-08-31· cited 20×
- Duberry v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.District of Columbia· 2012-10-17· cited 18×
- Monica A. CHARLES, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DefendantDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-19· cited 15×
- Hollabaugh v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-09· cited 14×
- Thompson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-28· cited 7×
- Gaines v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2013-08-21· cited 6×
- Peterson v. ArchstoneDistrict of Columbia· 2009-02-27· cited 5×
- Ghori-Ahmad v. United States Commission on International Religious FreedomDistrict of Columbia· 2013-09-17· cited 4×
- Baseload Energy, Inc. v. RobertsDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-17· cited 1×
- ['DEVLIN v. BERRY']District of Columbia· 2014-03-18
- Ndondji v. Interpark, Inc.District of Columbia· 2011-03-09
- Smith v. WrightDistrict of Columbia· 2021-12-14
- Blackmon v. BarrDistrict of Columbia· 2022-09-12
- Nelson v. PompeoDistrict of Columbia· 2023-10-31
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 1,308×
- Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-12· cited 558×
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-05-29· cited 539×
- The Honorable Bob Barr v. William Jefferson ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2004-08-03· cited 279×
- Kingman Park Civic v. Williams, Anthony A.D.C. Circuit· 2003-11-14· cited 237×
- Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-09-17· cited 193×
- Carl v. Children's HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-23· cited 140×
- Biton v. Palestinian Interim Self-Government AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2004-03-18· cited 109×
- Andrew Maurice Redwood v. Council of the District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1982-05-28· cited 27×
- Coleman v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District of Columbia· 2004-03-17· cited 25×
- Hunt v. D.C. Department of CorrectionsDistrict of Columbia· 1999-03-26· cited 22×
- Boulton v. Institute of International EducationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-10-10· cited 20×
- Taye v. AmundsonDistrict of Columbia· 1995-12-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.