Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 3/12/2003
Rowley v. Massachusetts Electric Co.
Citations
- 438 Mass. 798
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to consider two issues, in part, because more fully developed record was required
- “A statute must be interpreted ... in connection with the cause of its enactment, the mischief or imperfection to be remedied and the main object to be accomplished”
- court uses standard rules of grammar when interpreting statutory language
- court applies \standard rules of grammar when interpreting statutory language\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cordy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Casseus v. E. Bus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-02-08· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. Sokphann ChhimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-08-02· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. RaposoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-05-07· cited 31×
- Hickey v. Pathways Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-09-22· cited 23×
- Capreal, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-05-06· cited 19×
- Adams v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2005-08-31· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. DaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-10-26· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. LeBlancMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-10-28· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. G.F.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-03-20· cited 11×
- ENGIE Gas & LNG LLC v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-08-17· cited 7×
- National Lumber Co. v. LombardiMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2005-09-09· cited 7×
- New England Power Generators Association, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-09-04· cited 6×
- Zora Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnettMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-06-21· cited 6×
- Lighthouse Masonry, Inc. v. Division of Administrative Law AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-12-31· cited 5×
- McGovern v. McGovernMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-09-16· cited 5×
- Robinson v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-06-27· cited 4×
- Hanson v. Cadwell Crossing, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-06-12· cited 4×
- First Massachusetts Bank, N.A. v. FlorianMassachusetts Superior Court· 2003-04-28· cited 1×
- Sears v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-02-06
- Smaland Beach Ass'n v. GenovaMassachusetts Superior Court· 2006-05-31
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1934-05-25· cited 171×
- Cuddyer v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-07-12· cited 165×
- New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-05-03· cited 71×
- Bon v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1914-01-12· cited 47×
- Casella v. SneiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-12-05· cited 41×
- Murray v. CarothersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1858-06-21· cited 32×
- Emery v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-12-16· cited 23×
- Fleck v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-12-30· cited 18×
- Tattan v. KurlanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-03-20· cited 17×
- Motley v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1875-12-28· cited 16×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-03-22· cited 14×
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama· 1995-06-23· cited 7×
- Hall v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1912-02-29· cited 7×
- Agostini v. North Adams Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1928-11-26· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.