Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/9/1998
Tate v. State
Citations
- 981 S.W.2d 189
- 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 168
- 1998 WL 846882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a jury could not \properly convict or acquit absent the opportunity to hear proffered testimony bearing upon a theory of defense and weigh its credibility along with other evidence in the case.\
- holding that evidence of a threat made by a decedent a month or two before his death was admissible under rule 404(b
- holding that evidence of a threat made by a decedent a month or two before his death was admissible under rule 404(b
- holding that victim's testimony--that victim had previously threatened defendant--was admissible because it shed light on the victim's state of mind on the night of the murder
- noting that the specific act shed fight on the deceased’s state of mind and demonstrated the intent or motive behind the confrontation
- holding that defendant may introduce evidence of a threatening statement made by the deceased to a third party to prove the deceased's intent, motive, or state of mind at the time of the murder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mansfield, Baird, Overstreet, Price, Holland, Womack, Meyers, Keller, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mozon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-28· cited 693×
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-04-03· cited 443×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-01-17· cited 162×
- Brandon Robisheaux v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-07· cited 143×
- Ex Parte MillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-22· cited 142×
- Tate v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-03-11· cited 104×
- Fox v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-11-06· cited 83×
- Commonwealth v. AdjutantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-03-14· cited 78×
- Gutierrez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-10-03· cited 69×
- London v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-04-29· cited 61×
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-15· cited 47×
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-04-27· cited 33×
- Hayes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-01-15· cited 29×
- Rodney Wayne Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-04· cited 28×
- Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2003-03-26· cited 27×
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-03-15· cited 27×
- In the Matter of A.A.B.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-11· cited 21×
- Dudzik v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-01-27· cited 18×
- Salazar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-03-07· cited 14×
- Tenny v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-07-07· cited 9×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Purtell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-11-02· cited 171×
- Dempsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1954-04-07· cited 98×
- United States v. Ronald Keiser, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-16· cited 92×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-14· cited 72×
- Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-01· cited 65×
- United States v. George Michael McClureFifth Circuit· 1977-02-07· cited 57×
- Beecham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-09· cited 52×
- Gonzales v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-09-15· cited 42×
- Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-05-15· cited 38×
- Lowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-03-11· cited 24×
- Tate v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-12-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.