Seventh Circuit· 8/12/2019
Tapanga Hardeman v. David Wathen
Citations
- 933 F.3d 816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections extend to conditions of confinement cases brought by pretrial detainees
- recognizing clearly established right of inmates “not to be forced to live surrounded by their own and others’ excrement”
- deprivation must be extreme and officials must have acted unreasonably in response to it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Flaum, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Tapanga Hardeman v. David Wathen
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.