Skip to main content
· 9/8/2011

Minix v. CANARECCI

Citations

  • 956 N.E.2d 62
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1714
  • 2011 WL 3962768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the statement of facts should be devoid of argument”
  • party who believed federal consent judgment was in error should have sought relief in federal courts
  • argument not raised before the trial court is waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Kirsch, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.