Oregon Supreme Court· 2/15/1967
Hood River County v. Dabney
Citations
- 423 P.2d 954
- 246 Or. 14
- 1967 Ore. LEXIS 536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, absent due process violation, there was no indication that legislature intended violation of statutory notice requirement to result in void judgment
- affirming dismissal of untimely appeal from tax foreclosure where county's notice had erroneously stated that property owner had 42 days to appeal rather than 60 days
- affirming dismissal of untimely appeal from tax foreclosure where county’s notice had erroneously stated that property owner had 42 days to appeal rather than 60 days
- stating the presumptions that property owners are assumed to know
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAllister, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin, Denecke, Holman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research Foundation Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-19· cited 63×
- Rogue Valley Memorial Hospital v. Salem Insurance Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-06-01· cited 32×
- Willis v. StagerOregon Supreme Court· 1971-02-18· cited 29×
- Kroupa v. KroupaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-01-14· cited 23×
- State Construction Corporation v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court· 1971-05-26· cited 20×
- Shaffer v. Mareve Oil CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1974-04-02· cited 18×
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-07-25· cited 17×
- Benoit v. PanthakyThird Circuit· 1985-12-30· cited 17×
- Frederiksen v. LaFleurUtah Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 14×
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-01-22· cited 14×
- Montoya v. Housing Authority of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-03-10· cited 12×
- Scott v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court· 2016-03-24· cited 12×
- In Re the Estate of WagnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-12-28· cited 11×
- Chizek v. Port of NewportOregon Supreme Court· 1969-02-19· cited 10×
- Cooley v. FredinburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-11-13· cited 8×
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. UP Ventures II, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2009-03-27· cited 8×
- Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research FoundationNinth Circuit· 1999-08-19· cited 7×
- Hogue v. Olympic BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-10-30· cited 7×
- Umatilla County v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-03-05· cited 6×
- Coulter v. GoughNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 5×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Turner v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1897-10-18· cited 100×
- Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals· 1900-03-27· cited 83×
- Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-12-16· cited 46×
- City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1944-07-03· cited 46×
- Elbert, Ltd. v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-08-14· cited 30×
- Elliott v. ClementOregon Supreme Court· 1944-09-19· cited 29×
- Sears v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-11-15· cited 20×
- Ensign v. BarseNew York Court of Appeals· 1888-01-24· cited 17×
- Davault v. EssigCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-07-24· cited 15×
- George F. Weaver Sons Co. v. BurgessNew York Court of Appeals· 1959-12-30· cited 15×
- Miller v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court· 1908-08-06· cited 12×
- Murphy v. Clackamas County & Jones Lumber Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-12-16· cited 8×
- Keerins Bros. v. MauneyOregon Supreme Court· 1950-06-20· cited 7×
- Evergreen Timber Co. v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1963-10-23· cited 5×
- City of Utica v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1956-11-14· cited 4×
- 149-155 Swan Street Corp. v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court· 1954-08-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.