Tang v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pending motion for change of venue did not excuse alien’s attendance at hearing
• observing that an ineffective-assistance claim in the immigration context requires deficient performance that denies the alien a fundamentally fair proceeding
• noting no abuse of discretion by BIA’s denial of motion to reopen where petitioner failed to comply with Lozada
• declining to “decide whether substantial compliance [with Lozada] would be sufficient because [the petitioner] . . . made no attempt to comply with any of Lozada’s requirements”
• assuming without deciding that counsel’s deficient performance can amount to exceptional circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Infanzon v. Ashcroft
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-10-28· cited 178×
• Gurung v. Ashcroft
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-06-03· cited 52×
• Contreras v. Attorney General of United States
  Third Circuit· 2012-01-04· cited 44×
• Georcely v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2004-07-12· cited 37×
• Hamilton v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-05-01· cited 32×
• Mena-Flores v. Holder
  Tenth Circuit· 2015-01-23· cited 29×
• Sosa-Valenzuela v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-05-01· cited 26×
• Mendiola v. Holder
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-10-28· cited 24×
• Martinez Molina v. Holder
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-08-19· cited 13×
• Thongphilack v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-11-06· cited 10×
• Yero v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-06-08· cited 1×
• Thongphilack v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-09-11
• Assistance of Counsel in Removal Proceedings (I)
  Office of Legal Counsel· 2009-01-07
• Feng Chai Wang v. United States Department of Justice
  Second Circuit· 2005-12-20

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• LOZADA
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1988-07-01· cited 1,900×
• Julio Lozada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  First Circuit· 1988-09-14· cited 277×
• Xu Yong Lu v. John Ashcroft
  Third Circuit· 2001-07-24· cited 275×
• Jose Manuel Celis-Castellano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-08-05· cited 201×
• Edith Stewart v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-06-23· cited 145×
• Fong Yang Lo, AKA Fong Yang Yu Bin Lo v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-08-27· cited 133×
• Angela Stroe and Marin Stroe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-06-26· cited 128×
• Mickeviciute v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Tenth Circuit· 2003-04-28· cited 120×
• Gbaya v. United States Attorney General
  Eleventh Circuit· 2003-08-19· cited 90×
• Bhima Nathubhai Patel v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-05-28· cited 78×
• Pablo Maldonado-Perez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  D.C. Circuit· 1989-01-17· cited 55×
• Herbert v. Ashcroft
  First Circuit· 2003-04-08· cited 53×
• Ricardo Hernandez-Vivas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-05-11· cited 52×
• Osei v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-09-24· cited 50×
• Faisal Al Hamid v. John Ashcroft
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-07-15· cited 49×
• De Morales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-06-26· cited 48×
• Allen M. Wijeratne, Formerly Known as Allen M. Lowe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-04-24· cited 44×
• Porfirio Romero-Morales v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Second Circuit· 1994-05-27· cited 43×