Skip to main content
· 12/29/2003

Tang v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 1192
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26325
  • 2003 WL 23019858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pending motion for change of venue did not excuse alien’s attendance at hearing
  • observing that an ineffective-assistance claim in the immigration context requires deficient performance that denies the alien a fundamentally fair proceeding
  • noting no abuse of discretion by BIA’s denial of motion to reopen where petitioner failed to comply with Lozada
  • declining to “decide whether substantial compliance [with Lozada] would be sufficient because [the petitioner] . . . made no attempt to comply with any of Lozada’s requirements”
  • assuming without deciding that counsel’s deficient performance can amount to exceptional circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Briscoe, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.