· 12/29/2003
Tang v. Ashcroft
Citations
- 354 F.3d 1192
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26325
- 2003 WL 23019858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pending motion for change of venue did not excuse alien’s attendance at hearing
- observing that an ineffective-assistance claim in the immigration context requires deficient performance that denies the alien a fundamentally fair proceeding
- noting no abuse of discretion by BIA’s denial of motion to reopen where petitioner failed to comply with Lozada
- declining to “decide whether substantial compliance [with Lozada] would be sufficient because [the petitioner] . . . made no attempt to comply with any of Lozada’s requirements”
- assuming without deciding that counsel’s deficient performance can amount to exceptional circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Briscoe, Lucero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.