Gbaya v. United States Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the board’s rejection of the petitioner’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim where the petitioner failed 3 Case: 20-10682 Date Filed: 08/28/2020 Page: 4 of 4 to comply with Matter of Lozada
• “The BIA does not abuse its discretion by filtering ineffective assistance of counsel claims through the screening requirements of Lozada . . . .”
• “The BIA does not abuse its discretion by filtering ineffective assistance of counsel claims through the screening requirements of Lozada . . . .”
• “In this case, we need not decide whether the BIA may enforce strict compliance with Lozada or must also accept substantial compliance. Gbaya has achieved neither.”
• “[i]n this particular area, the BIA’s discretion is quite broad”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).