Xu Yong Lu v. John Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 1229a(c)(6) went into effect on April 1, 1997
• affirming a denial of a motion to reopen where the petitioner failed to meet two of the three Lozada requirements
• Board’s procedural requirements for asserting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel are generally reasonable exercise of its discretion
• “we are concerned that courts could apply Lozada’s third prong so strictly that it would effectively require all petitioners claiming ineffective assistance to file a bar complaint.”
• \Congress has long recognized the importance of counsel in immigration proceedings.\
• “This is the first opportunity we have had to review the Board’s three prong test for analyzing ineffective assistance of counsel claims. We conclude that it is a reasonable exercise of the Board’s discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).