W.D. Michigan· 10/26/1983
Taglia v. Pabst Brewing Co.
Citations
- 611 F. Supp. 1
- 38 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 281
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming that employee who brought Title VII complaint against company to which she was 12 assigned by temporary agency was employee of temporary agency
- noting that presumption regarding date of receipt does not change the limitation period from 60 to 65 days
- “Courts have the equitable authority to toll the statute of limitations while a matter is referred to arbitration . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Enslen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shafnacker v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-08-14· cited 33×
- Miller v. Soc. Sec. Admin.D. New Hampshire· 1996-06-06
- Manchester v. SSAD. New Hampshire· 2005-10-06
- Riesgo v. Heidelberg Harris, Inc.D. New Hampshire· 1997-05-30
- Cabletron v. AlliedD. New Hampshire· 1996-03-29
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsFirst Circuit· 1979-06-21· cited 812×
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanySixth Circuit· 1975-10-06· cited 310×
- Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1975-01-10· cited 293×
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corporation v. Storm King CorporationSixth Circuit· 1962-05-23· cited 264×
- Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyFifth Circuit· 1978-05-12· cited 228×
- Edward ACKERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1982-02-01· cited 223×
- Thomas P. BLACKWELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1983-01-10· cited 202×
- Frank Douglas v. Marvin Anderson, Raymond Hanson, Board of Directors, Hastings College of Law and Hastings Service Foundation, Inc., a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1981-09-17· cited 198×
- Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper CompanySixth Circuit· 1974-02-14· cited 130×
- Anthony Chavez v. Noble Drilling CorporationFifth Circuit· 1978-02-02· cited 58×
- Gallaway v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-04-07· cited 54×
- Ellis C. Irwin v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1977-08-26· cited 40×
- Joe Davis White v. Mississippi State Oil and Gas BoardFifth Circuit· 1981-05-29· cited 31×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1981-01-05· cited 30×
- Adama v. Doehler-Jarvis, Division of N L Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-07· cited 20×
- Mahler v. United StatesW.D. Pennsylvania· 1961-09-15· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.