Szucs v. QUALICO DEVELOPMENT, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filing motion four months after default is not due diligence in seeking to set aside default
• holding that filing motion four months after default is not due diligence in seeking to set aside default
• holding shareholder’s failure to hire counsel because he did not understand plaintiff corporation was seeking money judgment did not constitute excusable neglect
• determining that a defendant's failure to answer a complaint because of confusion about the case due to plaintiff's \relative indifference\ toward him in the litigation and the settlement negotiations regarding a codefendant was not excusable neglect
• determining that a defendant's failure to answer a complaint because of confusion about the case due to plaintiff's \relative indifference\ toward him in the litigation and the settlement negotiations regarding a codefendant was not excusable neglect
• “The standard of review for an order denying a motion to vacate default is whether the trial court abused its discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).