Goldome v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that excusable neglect not established where defendant corporation waited more than sixteen months after the default was entered before hiring counsel to represent its interests in seeking to have the default vacated
• holding defendant's misunderstanding that plaintiffs were seeking money judgment until after bank sought writ of garnishment was not legal excuse to vacate judgment
• holding defendant’s failure to hire counsel because he did not realize plaintiff sought money judgment was not excusable neglect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).