Joe-Lin v. Lrg Restaurant Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant's failure to retain counsel or to understand the legal consequences of its inactions was not excusable neglect
• holding that a defendant's failure to retain counsel or to understand the legal consequences of its inactions was not excusable neglect
• holding defendant corporation’s officers’ belief that writing letter to plaintiff, instead of hiring counsel to answer complaint, was sufficient response did not constitute excusable neglect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).