Szpyrka v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where the victims had positively identified the defendant, “it stretche[d] credulity to believe that the jury could have been swayed to such an extent that except for the improper remark by the police officer appellant would have been acquitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).