Skip to main content

Lucio v. State

Citations

  • 907 N.E.2d 1008
  • 2009 Ind. LEXIS 502
  • 2009 WL 1765656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that denial of mistrial was not abuse of discretion where statement was fleeting, inadvertent, and only a minor part of the evidence against the defendant and the trial court admonished jury to disregard the statement
  • stating that the remedy of a mistrial is “extreme strong medicine that should only be prescribed when no other action can be expected to remedy the situation at the trial level.”
  • emphasizing the “strong presumptions that juries follow courts’ instructions and that an admonition cures any error”
  • emphasizing the strong presumption that juries follow the courts’ instructions and that an admonishment cures any error
  • affirming denial of mistrial where witness’s reference to defendant’s time in jail was fleeting, inadvertent, and only a minor part of the evidence against defendant and the jury was admonished
  • upholding trial court’s denial of a mistrial motion despite witness’s reference to Lucio being jailed in the past, in part because the reference was a mistake by a civilian witness, no other witness testified to it, and the State did not argue it at the close of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.