Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 6/30/1986

Swett v. Schenk

Citations

  • 792 F.2d 1447
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the proper way to challenge agency’s decision to withhold testimony was a direct action pursuant to APA
  • “it is within the district court’s discretion, once the basis for removal 25 jurisdiction is dropped, whether to hear the rest of the action or remand it to the state court from 26 which it was removed”
  • “at is within 2 || the district court’s discretion, once the basis for removal jurisdiction is dropped, whether to hear 3 || the rest of the action or remand it to the state court from which it was removed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.