Skip to main content
· 10/30/1987

Cole v. Pathmark of Fairlawn

Citations

  • 672 F. Supp. 796
  • 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3037
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 202
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employee’s discharge claim preempted by LMRA but claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution stemming from employee’s arrest for shoplifting from employer not preempted; employee's injuries resulted not from discharge but from investigation and arrest on theft charges
  • employee’s discharge claim preempted by LMRA but claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution stemming from employee’s arrest for shoplifting from employer not preempted; employee’s injuries resulted not from discharge but from investigation and arrest on theft charges
  • resolving Section 301 preemption question on motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bissell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.