Skip to main content
· 5/23/1991

Jacqueline R. Harrell Michael Harrell v. 20th Century Insurance Company, and Bradley Scott

Citations

  • 934 F.2d 203
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3749
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 6048
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10351
  • 1991 WL 83396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the underlying cause of action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations, “the civil conspiracy claim also must fail”
  • holding that because the underlying cause of action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations, “the civil conspiracy claim also must fail”
  • holding a “district court has discretion to remand a properly removed case to state court when none of the federal claims are remaining”
  • noting after dismissal of federal claims, it is “generally preferable for a district court to remand remaining pendent claims to state court”
  • applying California law to conclude that a conspiracy claim failed because the statute of limitations barred the underlying cause of action for fraud
  • \it is generally preferable for a district court to remand remaining pendent claims to state court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.