Skip to main content

Sweeney v. Montgomery County

Citations

  • 107 Md. App. 187
  • 667 A.2d 922
  • 1995 Md. App. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[B]ecause the [b]oard failed to make crucial factual findings, our only viable alternative is to remand the case to the [b]oard.”
  • “The role of agency findings of fact in judicial review is crucial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salmon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.