Skip to main content
· 3/9/1984

United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO, Local 2610 v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Citations

  • 472 A.2d 62
  • 298 Md. 665
  • 1984 Md. LEXIS 227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Commissioner of Industry and Labor was required to include findings of fact and conclusions of law along with his order in a contested case under the APA
  • concluding the findings requirement of the Maryland Occupational Safety & Health Act (MOSHA) was not satisfied
  • “We must know what a decision means before the duty becomes ours to say whether it is right or wrong.”
  • “We must know what a decision means before the duty becomes ours to say whether it is right or wrong.”
  • “[I]n judicial review of agency action the court may not uphold the agency order unless it is sustainable on the agency’s findings and for the reasons- stated by the agency.”
  • “in judicial review of agency action the court may not uphold the agency order unless it is sustainable on the agency’s findings and for the reasons stated by the agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.