Skip to main content
· 10/9/1986

Ocean Hideaway Condominium Ass'n v. Boardwalk Plaza Venture

Citations

  • 515 A.2d 485
  • 68 Md. App. 650
  • 1986 Md. App. LEXIS 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving an appeal of a zoning decision made by the Ocean City Board of Zoning Appeals to permit construction of a seventeen-story building
  • board erred in adopting findings of fact that merely recited factors that it was obligated to consider in approving special exception
  • no substantial evidence to support factual findings of zoning authority; because of the lack of substantial evidence, zoning authority’s decision was not fairly debatable, and thus was “arbitrary, capricious and a denial of due process of law.”
  • “Although the Ocean City Board [of Zoning Appeals] did not use a prepared printed form, the method it used and the content of its ‘Findings of Fact’ amount to a simple repetition of the nine statutory requirements and nothing more.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Bell, Getty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.