· 10/9/1986
Ocean Hideaway Condominium Ass'n v. Boardwalk Plaza Venture
Citations
- 515 A.2d 485
- 68 Md. App. 650
- 1986 Md. App. LEXIS 398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- involving an appeal of a zoning decision made by the Ocean City Board of Zoning Appeals to permit construction of a seventeen-story building
- board erred in adopting findings of fact that merely recited factors that it was obligated to consider in approving special exception
- no substantial evidence to support factual findings of zoning authority; because of the lack of substantial evidence, zoning authority’s decision was not fairly debatable, and thus was “arbitrary, capricious and a denial of due process of law.”
- “Although the Ocean City Board [of Zoning Appeals] did not use a prepared printed form, the method it used and the content of its ‘Findings of Fact’ amount to a simple repetition of the nine statutory requirements and nothing more.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Bell, Getty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.