Swartz v. Schering-Plough Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if Swartz once held a trademark for SUN–BUG, it has been lost through abandonment”.
• “[T]he fact that [plaintiff] recently filed for a trademark does not establish use.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).