Swanson v. Swanson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a marital share consisted of 45% of the accrued Plan B benefits, plus cost of living adjustments and interest accrued on that 45% marital share during the deferral period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pullo v. Pullo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-13· cited 12×
• Marriage of Baggs v. Baggs
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2016-11-15· cited 12×
• Russell v. Russell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-22· cited 5×
• Kunsman v. Wall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-10· cited 3×
• Arnold v. Arnold
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-19· cited 2×
• Van Den Berg v. Van Den Berg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-15· cited 1×
• BAGGS v. BAGGS
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2016-11-15
• ANDREW CARDARELLI v. TRACY CARDARELLI/FORGERON
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-11-23
• CUMMINGS v. SASNETT
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2025-01-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boyett v. Boyett
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-11· cited 37×
• Trant v. Trant
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-14· cited 18×
• Acker v. Acker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-22· cited 13×
• Paris v. Paris
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-06· cited 5×