Paris v. Paris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \the Florida Supreme Court made it clear that the valuation of pension benefits must be made excluding any penalty for early retirement.\
• former wife should not share in any increase in salary earned by the former husband after the dissolution for purposes of calculating pension benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Acker v. Acker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-14· cited 26×
• Acker v. Acker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-22· cited 13×
• Swanson v. Swanson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-07· cited 9×
• Brown v. Minning
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-19· cited 2×
• Hollinger v. Baur
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-07· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• DeLoach v. DeLoach
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-21· cited 39×
• Boyett v. Boyett
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-11· cited 37×
• Boyett v. Boyett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-13· cited 9×
• Bain v. Bain
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-07· cited 6×