Skip to main content
· 4/13/2006

Pullo v. Pullo

Citations

  • 926 So. 2d 448
  • 2006 WL 941914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the former wife received an undivided individual property right in the former husband’s retirement account that, under the dissolution judgment, entitles her to a pro-rata share of his DROP fund,” including COLAs
  • invoking en banc process to resolve direct conflict between two panel opinions of court
  • invoking en banc process to resolve direct conflict between two panel opinions of court
  • en banc decision released without antecedent publication of panel decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.