Skip to main content

Swain v. State

Citations

  • 911 So. 2d 140
  • 2005 WL 1398472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant is not entitled to successive review of a specific issue decided against him in an earlier post-conviction proceeding even if the question concerns the legality of his sentence
  • stating that, under the law of the case doctrine, questions of law actually decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings
  • While successive 3.800(a) motions are permitted even though the claims could have been raised in previously filed 3.800(a
  • while successive Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motions are permitted even though the claims could have been raised in previously filed Rule 3.800(a
  • “[T]he law of the case doctrine prevents a litigant from relitigating the same issues previously considered and rejected on the merits and reviewed on appeal.”
  • “While successive 3.800(a) motions are permitted even though the claims are those which could have been raised in previously filed 3.800(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levy, C.J., and Ramirez and Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.