Skip to main content

Kelly v. State

Citations

  • 739 So. 2d 1164
  • 1999 WL 533606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \[s]uccessive 3.800(a) motions re-addressing issues previously considered and rejected on the merits and reviewed on appeal are barred by the doctrine of law of the case\
  • holding that consideration under rule 3.800(a) was not barred by law of the case because motion was first denied on procedural grounds
  • recognizing that the law of the case doctrine does not bar a successive 3.800(a) motion if the previous motion was denied on procedural grounds
  • holding that “[s]uccessive 3.800(a) motions re-addressing issues previously considered and rejected on the merits and reviewed on appeal are barred by the doctrine of law of the case”
  • observing that \[r]ule 3.800(a) motions now routinely rely on the language in Mancino which has been interpreted to allow review of any sentencing error discernable from the face of the record\
  • holding 3-year minimum mandatory term could not be imposed on youthful offender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.