Skip to main content
· 7/9/1987

Urseth v. City of Dayton

Citations

  • 680 F. Supp. 1084
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13117
  • 1987 WL 44276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] settlement offer or the fact of settlement negotiations is not direct evidence regarding the factual issues in a case.”
  • court’s task is to determine whether extraneous information would prejudice an “objective, ‘typical juror’ ”
  • “[A] settlement offer or the fact of settlement negotiations is not direct evidence regarding the factual issues in a case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.