Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 1/12/2017

Sutton v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Citations

  • 228 F. Supp. 3d 254
  • 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4841
  • 2017 WL 122989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “incidental costs related to the sending of correspondence” to the servicer, including “postage and travel,” are not actual damages under RESPA because such a rule “would transform virtually all unsatisfactory borrower inquiries into RESPA lawsuits”
  • assuming that a private right of action exists under § 1024.35, based on the CFPB’s statements, the remedial purposes of RESPA and Regulation X, and the existence of a private right of action by way of § 2605(f)
  • collecting cases which hold that demonstrating proximate cause is a requirement of a RESPA claim
  • assuming for the sake of the motion at issue that a private right of action under 12 C.F.R. § 1024.35 exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Failla

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.