Skip to main content
· 8/24/2015

Denise Edwards v. the First American Corp

Citations

  • 798 F.3d 1172
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14841
  • 2015 WL 4999329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing transfer of authority for rulemaking, enforcement, and compliance of RESPA from Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, to CFPB
  • discussing transfer of authority for rulemaking, enforcement, and compliance with RESPA from Department of Housing and Urban Development to CFPB
  • noting the court had previously vacated the 2 district court’s first denial of class certification so that the plaintiff could pursue additional 3 discovery in an attempt to cure the identified deficiency and file a renewed motion for class 4 certification
  • “[T]he law does not require every term of the contract to have a separately stated consideration.”
  • “This common scheme, if true, presents a significant aspect of [the defendant’s] transactions that warrant class adjudication . . . .”
  • Rule 23 determinations “will inevitably touch upon the merits of plaintiffs’ underlying ... claims” but cautioning that a class certification should not become a “mini-trial on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Gould, Tallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.