Jaime Medrano v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the statutory duty to respond [under § 2605(e)] doe's not' arise with respect to all inquiries or complaints from borrowers to servicers”
• explaining that “only servicers of loans are subject to § 2605(e)’s duty to respond” to a qualified written request
• describing “servicer’s role” as 14 “receiving the borrower’s payments and making payments to the borrower’s creditors”
• interpreting what qualifies as a QWR under § 2605(e) and recognizing the “broad remedial purpose” of RESPA
• defining a qualified written request that triggers a servicer’s duty to respond under RESPA
• collecting district court cases holding correspondence challenging loan validity do not relate to servicing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).