Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the standard for withholding of removal is more demanding than the standard for asylum
• holding that Article 34 of the 1967 Protocol is not self-executing because the language is merely “prec-atory”
• holding that to qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate a “clear probability” of persecution if removed
• holding that the standard for withholding of removal is more demanding than the standard for asylum
• holding that eligibility for the relief of withholding of deportation is the \clear probability of persecution\ standard
• holding that an applicant must establish a clear probability of persecution for withholding of removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).